<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pushing kernels more aggressively to updates-testing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davidnielsen.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/pushing-kernels-more-aggressively-to-updates-testing/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davidnielsen.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/pushing-kernels-more-aggressively-to-updates-testing/</link>
	<description>Random madness, including but not limited to GNOME and Linux</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 21:07:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: davidnielsen</title>
		<link>http://davidnielsen.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/pushing-kernels-more-aggressively-to-updates-testing/#comment-232</link>
		<dc:creator>davidnielsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidnielsen.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-232</guid>
		<description>Naturally, we need to expose bodhi more to get better feedback as well as automate the collection of data where we can. It would be easy to do testing such as &quot;does this kernel boot and have internet&quot; (remember if we can boot, get online and yum works, a problem can be fixed in most cases so this would be important regression testing to do).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naturally, we need to expose bodhi more to get better feedback as well as automate the collection of data where we can. It would be easy to do testing such as &#8220;does this kernel boot and have internet&#8221; (remember if we can boot, get online and yum works, a problem can be fixed in most cases so this would be important regression testing to do).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dead1nside</title>
		<link>http://davidnielsen.wordpress.com/2008/07/06/pushing-kernels-more-aggressively-to-updates-testing/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>dead1nside</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 15:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davidnielsen.wordpress.com/?p=297#comment-231</guid>
		<description>I definitely agree with all you&#039;ve said regarding this. I suspect that some of the problems I have been having with WPA2 passphrases being unrecognised has something to do with this. I only recently found out that people using updates-testing repository can give karma to updates, being a first indicator if a package is &#039;bad&#039; or &#039;good&#039;. I would have thought that this process would have whittled out the bad kernel update. Oh well, it&#039;s all a lesson for the future. Thanks for the write up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I definitely agree with all you&#8217;ve said regarding this. I suspect that some of the problems I have been having with WPA2 passphrases being unrecognised has something to do with this. I only recently found out that people using updates-testing repository can give karma to updates, being a first indicator if a package is &#8216;bad&#8217; or &#8216;good&#8217;. I would have thought that this process would have whittled out the bad kernel update. Oh well, it&#8217;s all a lesson for the future. Thanks for the write up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
